Need something to improve your 500 KHz
reception? Try this simple to build Loop Antenna with Preamplifier, contributed by
WA1ZMS
- - - - -
New 500-kHz DISTANCE
RECORD SET BY /6 !
On Feb. 21, experimental station WD2XSH/6 was
received on
Roi-Namur in the Marshall Islands
(6,679 mi) by Neil Schwanitz, V73NS/WB8CRT. WD2XSH/6 is located in Long Beach,
MS, and operated by Pat Hamel, W5THT. An article on Pat's station is featured
in the March issue of "QST".
- - - -
500-kHz DISTANCE RECORD !
On Jan. 17, experimental station WD2XSH/20 was received on
Roi-Namur in the Marshall Islands (4737
mi) by Neil Schwanitz, V73NS/WB8CRT. WD2XSH/20 is located in Cottage Grove, OR
and operated by Rudy Severns N6LF. The transmission in CW at about 13 wpm was
copyable by ear and appears in the Spectran
capture as well. "SL" in the capture is an NDB on 505 kHz located in
Khomotovo, Russia.
- - - - -
SSB operation on 600 Meters? You
bet!!
Here's a
recording made by Dick, WA3USG on January 27, 2008. Dick reports:
"Here's a snipet of the SSB activity on 510 KHz Sunday
evening. I copied WE2XGR/1, /2, and /3. This is using my SDR/IQ and my AMRAD
E-Field probe. Boy, down here the audio almost sounds like good A.M.
modulation!" ssb510_jan27.wav
- - - -
-
Rik
Strobbe ON7YD is now on the air from Belgium. Here's his
report:
" I want to inform you
that since 29 January I am QRV on 600 meter. Temporarily only on 503.1 kHz with
about 0.5 Watt ERP but in the near future I intend to increase my ERP to about
3 Watt and will be able to transmit the in entire 501-504 kHz range. The call
used is OR7T.
" According to the recent
decision of BIPT (Belgian FCC) any holder of a full licence can operate 501-504
kHz with maximum 5 Watt ERP on a secundary (non interference) base. Mode is
limited to CW (including QRSS). In the past days I have been able to work about
a dozen UK stations (G, GW, GI, GM), best DX is GM4SLV at about 1100km. In the
same period I received reports from PA, F, DL, G, SP, OK, SM and OH (best DX
1680 km). "
- - - -
-
UK Hams on 500 KHz
are now allowed 1 Watt ERP.
See
http://www.ofcom.org.uk/radiocomms/ifi/licensing/classes/amateur/Notices/20080201
For your
enjoyment, here are some ARGO captures made at
W5JGV on New Years Eve. It looks like some transmitter adjustments were
going on. Click on any of the thumbnails for a larger
picture. When viewing a large picture, clicking on
the upper right hand button will start a slide show. For show speed and other
adjustments, simply click on the "help" link at
the bottom of the page.
- - - -
-
Finbar, EI0CF/GI4DPE (Ireland) sent recordings of two of the
WE2XGR experimental stations. These were recorded on 12 December 2007. Clip #1 -
WE2XGR/6 - Clip #2 - WE3XGR/6 and
?
- - -
- -
ARRL Experiment featured in November 2007 issue of
the Swedish Amateur Radio magazine "QTC"
Click
HERE for a PDF file of
the article.
- - - - -
Part 5 Experimental Station
WE2XGR joins in experimental project on the 600
Meter band.
The license for WE2XGR was issued
by the FCC on September 5 with the following specifications:
Power 200 Watts ERP, Frequency
505-515 KHz , Modes CW, SSB, and data, Term 5 Years (expires Sept 1
2012)
For information
about individual WE2XGR stations, click HERE. For the WE2XGR license, click
HERE.
- - - - -
The November 2007 Status Report
for the WD2XSH project is available for downloading at
THIS LINK.
Thanks to Fritz
Raab, W1FR, the Experiment Coordinator for preparing this
report.
WE2XGR/2 seen running in Hellschreiber mode on 600
Meters
ARGO capture by WD2XSH/13

Quoting John, "At 0140 copied a very
clear Hellschreiber transmission from XGR Burlington VT. It surprised the hell
out of me!!! 506.600 KHz. It was clearly readable in spite of relatively high
level of QRN to the East. It popped up on the ARGO screen running in normal
mode. John O. /13"
- - - - -
Do trees work as
600 Meter antennas? Yes! See
THIS PAGE for details. Be
sure to follow the link to the RF preamplifier that I built for the antenna. It
has power-over-the-coax, and can be used with many types of antennas. Lots of
gain, and low noise. (tnx
K06BB)
Data shown on the maps below is
excerpted from the Second Report sent to the ARRL and
compiled by W1FR.
During the past three
months, the WD2XSH stations have added 2250 hours of operation, bringing the
total to 4629. Twenty-seven additional QSOs have been made, bringing the total
to 75. Over 3100 reception reports have been filed on our web site. A map
showing the QSOs appears below, and statistics for each station are given in
the appendix of the latest report. Most of the "records" for QSO and reception
distances that were set in the first quarter have not been broken. The longest
distance over which a QSO has been maintained is 884 mi from New Hampshire to
Tennessee. Station /10 (W4DEX) completed a cross-band (500 kHz - 137 kHz) QSO
with WD2XNS (W1VD) in Connecticut.

WD2XSH Station QSO Paths as of 28 FEB 2007
Reception
Reports for some of the WD2XSH Stations are shown in the maps below.
The station location is indicated by a
red star. Blue diamonds indicate reception locations for that station.

Reception Reports for Station
WD2XSH / 6

Reception Reports for Station WD2XSH /
10

Reception Reports for Station
WD2XSH / 19

Reception
Reports for Station WD2XSH / 20
K2ORS files application for
Part 5 License for 505 - 515
KC
From the ARRL Web Site:
NEWINGTON, CT, Sep 15, 2006 --
(As of September 13, 2006) The FCC's Office of Engineering and
Technology has granted a Part 5 experimental license to the ARRL on behalf of a
group of radio amateurs interested in investigating spectrum in the vicinity of
500 kHz. Experimental license WD2XSH was issued September 13. The two-year
authorization permits experimentation and research between 505 and 510 kHz (600
meters) using narrowband modes at power levels of up to 20 W effective radiated
power (ERP). ARRL Member Fritz Raab, W1FR, of Vermont, will serve as
experimental project manager for "The 500 KC Experimental Group for Amateur
Radio."
Monday, May 1,
2006 - There is a move being made by
some in the "Maritime" radio community to have the
600 Meter band and 500 KHz remain (silent except for certain memorial stations)
as a permanent memorial to marine radio history. This, of course, would
effectively eliminate any possibility of obtaining an Amateur allocation in the
600 Meter band.
Fritz Raab, W1FR, has written a concise report on
this potentially divisive situation. This topic is so
important that I have printed his entire report here. You
may download his report as a PDF file by clicking HERE.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
GMRR M06-1A COOPERATION ON THE FUTURE
OF THE 600-METER BAND
Prepared by Fritz Raab, W1FR, 8 March 2006
Two groups are interested in preserving the
600-meter band (495 - 510 kHz) that was formerly used for maritime telegraphic
communication. The "Amateur" community would like to see the 600-meter band
become an amateur band. The "Maritime" community would like the band to remain
silent except for use by the historical maritime CW stations (HMS). Of course,
it isn't quite this simple and a number of us have interests in both areas. The
start of the new year seems to be a good time to suggest we all think about
cooperating and working together to preserve this historic piece of spectrum.
First here are some basic facts:
(1) The 600-meter band *was* for a century
an extremely important maritime-communication band. However, the SOLAS treaty
and subsequent creation of the GMDSS ensured the demise of maritime
communication on 500 kHz. 600 meters has since become virtually abandoned for
real maritime communication and is now used only for occasional special-event
transmissions by organizations such as the Maritime Radio Historical Society
(MRHS).
(2) There is *no* chance that real maritime
communication at 500 kHz will be revived. The equipment costs 100 to 1000 times
as much as UHF equipment, and trained operators would be needed.
(3) The spectrum at 500-kHz is very valuable
and has many potential uses, including DGPS, traffic-information service,
broadcasting, homeland security, and NAVTEX. None of these potential users will
tolerate sharing the band with historical maritime stations.
(4) Occasional use by historical stations is
not going to hold the band against commercial pressures and other national
interests.
(5) No regulatory agency - national or
international - is going to allocate useful frequencies for "silence." Our FCC
would no doubt like to find a way to auction it off! I expect that in one or
two more WRC cycles, we will see a reallocation.
(6) In the USA, 435 -495 kHz has been
claimed by the USCG for their new HA DGPS. The bands from 190 to 285 kHz and
325 to 435 kHz are being used by aeronautical NDBs. The band from 285 to 325 is
filled with marine DGPS beacons. Thus the only MF range that can potentially be
reallocated to amateurs are 495 - 505 kHz internationally plus 505 - 510 kHz in
Region II. Now I think all of us -both maritime and amateur groups - can agree
that we do not want to see DGPS, broadcasting, TIS, or NAVTEX in the 600-meter
band. Most all of us would like to see CW and historical maritime communication
able to continue in this band. With this in mind, it makes sense for the
amateur and marine factions to become partners in preserving the band against
other interests.
Amateurs will get at most a secondary
allocation at 600 meters. That means when special- event maritime transmissions
are underway, amateurs will have to stay out of the way. As a practical matter,
most of us will be trying to listen for the special-event transmissions instead
of operating.
Once there is an amateur allocation at 600
meters, the ARRL, RSGB, WIA, and other national amateur organizations will
police the band against interlopers and protect it against other would-be
users. This will be to the advantage of both the maritime and amateur groups.
The combined resources of the amateur organizations (ARRL, RSGB, WIA, RAC,
etc.) far exceeds that of the maritime community (e.g., MRHS). Thus making an
ally of the amateurs should give the maritime community clout that it would
otherwise not have.
The presence of amateurs in this band will
ensure that CW will be heard into the forseeable future. No other service will
use CW. I doubt there will be a lot of commercial ham rigs capable of operating
in this band, so I do not see it becoming crowded like some of the HF bands.
There will, of course, need be some sort of
a band plan for amateur use. Exactly what will depend upon how much spectrum we
could get. As a minimum, a band plan will need to provide for the possibility
of marine operation at 500 kHz and to separate amateur beacons, CW, and digital
transmissions. It may make sense to leave 499 - 501 for the historical maritime
stations, or perhaps it could be also be used for amateur calling, emergency
comms, and bulletins, much as its original use.
Amateur use of a small band like 600 meters
will have to be limited to CW, PSK-31, and other narrowband modulations, which
can easily be kept out of the way of maritime communications. However, it may
be possible to arrange for some other types of transmissions on a special-event
basis. For example, during annual "maritime or Fessenden days," MCW and AM
could be allowed.
The most important reasons for amateurs to
be able to use 600 meters is to provide reliable regional communications in an
emergency. To this end, it should be able to arrange permission for
"cross-service" communication with the historical maritime stations, resulting
in a larger and more effective emergency-comms capability. This capability will
be a much more important reason to retain a frequency allocation at 500 kHz
than are either the occasional historical operations or ordinary amateur
operations.
Future operations of
maritime-historical-radio organizations such as MRHS requires a continuing
source of new members, as there will be no more maritime radio officers trained
in the use CW. Shared use of the 600-meter band with amateurs will be an
effective way of interesting amateurs in maritime-radio history. These amateurs
will help expand the historical organizations in the near future and ensure
their continuance in the more distant future.
The maritime community may agree that
amateurs would be better than the other would-be users, but prefer to wait
until there is a real threat from one of the other would-be users. This is a
risky approach. If we wait until some commercial or government entity develops
an interest in this frequency band, it is going to be difficult or impossible
to stop them.
We can work together to preserve this
historic frequency band - or we can squabble among ourselves and loose it to
another service that neither of us likes. My hope in writing this is that
everyone involved can see the need for cooperation and the mutual benefit in
sharing the band. When it comes time for the ARRL to file a petition for
amateur access, my hope is that MRHS and others in the maritime faction will
file supporting briefs so that together we can preserve this historic piece of
the spectrum.
de W1FR
Tuesday,
28 June 2005 - I've been
receiving quite a few emails wanting to know when the group member stations
will begin transmissions. The simple answer is - not until we receive the
license from the FCC. When will that be? Your guess is as good as mine. There
are a lot of details that the FCC must consider carefully before making a
decision of whether or not to grant the license. In the meantime, the group
members will be making plans to get on the air at the earliest opportunity,
whether it be with homebrew rigs or modified gear.
Please, let me point out once again that the
fact the FCC has assigned the call letters WD2XSH to this application NOT mean
that the actual license has been granted. It simply means that it is "in the
pipeline," so to speak, for processing in the usual manner.
Other email messages have inquired as to what
modes, frequencies and power levels we will be using. This information is all
in the application, but it typical FCC-speak, so some of it is difficult to
figure out. So, courtesy of Frederic Raab, W1FR, here's the scoop on what's
what: Frequency
of Operation - 495 to 510 KHz Maximum Power
Output to Antenna - 100 Watts Maximum EIRP -
20 Watts Emission Modes - CW and PSK31 Number of Stations - 23
[Editor's note - 24 June 2005] The
processing of a Part 5 application can require many months after filing the
paperwork with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). This lengthy
process is required because the safe use of the radio frequency spectrum that
is already licensed to government, military and various commercial and private
interests must be carefully protected. It is almost certain that there will be
some revisions and clarifications of the application paperwork before the
license is granted. Because of these changes and revisions, the final grant of
license will often contain substantial differences from the original
application.
To clarify - the assignment of the call
letters WD2XSH to this Part 5 application DOES NOT mean that the actual license
is about to be granted. It may be as long as a year - or even longer -
before the status of the application is finally decided, and the license to
operate is either granted or denied. - W5JGV
-
Wednesday, 22 June 2005 - Washington,
D.C. - The Federal Communications Commission has
issued the call letters WD2XSH for the 600 Meter Part 5 Experimental operations
to be conducted by the ARRL 600 Meter Experimental Group. The actual grant of
license will be done in the normal course of operations by the
FCC.
In the meantime, it is
reported that members of the Experimental Group are melting solder, tuning
transmitters, stringing feedlines, and polishing their keys in eager
anticipation of the issuance of the license itself, which will allow then to
commence operations on 600 Meters.
All operations will
necessarily adhere to the Part 5 rules and to the proposed plan of research
specified in the license application. Results of the project will be forwarded
to the Commission and posted on this web site. When transmissions actually
commence, we will post a notice on this web page.
Reception reports of the
transmissions made by Group participants are requested. You do not have to be a
member of this group to send us a reception report. Please use the link at the
left side of this web page to enter your reports.
Friday, 24 June 2005 -
(Additional information from Walt Ireland, WB7CSL ARRL
Technical Relations Office) - At any time during
the processing of the Part 5 license application, any government agency that
has reason to believe that the proposed 600 Meter transmissions might cause
interference with their use of the radio spectrum may file an objection with
the NITA and the FCC. Filing such an objection could delay or even prevent the
license from being issued.
NTIA stands for National
Information & Telecommunications Administration, and it works like an FCC
for Government communication users. For example, the US Coast Guard would go to
NTIA if it believed that any of the frequencies requested for the experimental
license could cause them interference.
ARRL files request
with the FCC for 600 Meter Experimental License
23 US Amateur operators
selected for experimental project.
>> The following is
from the ARRL web site <<
"NEWINGTON, CT, Apr 22, 2005--The ARRL has applied to
the FCC for a Part 5 Experimental license on behalf of a group of radio
amateurs interested in operating in the vicinity of 500 kHz. ARRL General
Counsel Chris Imlay, W3KD, announced the filing during a meeting of the ARRL
Executive Committee April 9 in Denver. The experimental application was among
several items the EC dealt with in addition to the previously reported
recommendations to the ARRL Board of Directors regarding a planned
regulation-by-bandwidth petition.
If granted, the two-year Part 5 license would permit
experimentation and research between 495 and 510 kHz--just below the Standard
AM Broadcast Band--at power levels of up to 20 W effective radiated power.
Modes would be CW and PSK31. ARRL Member Fred Raab, W1FR, of Burlington,
Vermont, would manage the project, which calls for 23 discrete fixed sites
across the US. The license application requests authorization for experimental
stations at Raab's QTH in Vermont as well as at sites in Arkansas, California,
Colorado, Illinois, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, New
Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island,
Tennessee, Texas and Virginia".
[Home] |